seminars:stat:201015
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| seminars:stat:201015 [2020/10/10 17:33] – qyu | seminars:stat:201015 [2020/10/10 17:34] (current) – qyu | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <WRAP centeralign>## | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP 70% center> | ||
| + | ^ **DATE: | ||
| + | ^ **TIME: | ||
| + | ^ **LOCATION: | ||
| + | ^ **SPEAKER: | ||
| + | ^ **TITLE: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center box 80%> | ||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | The standard mixture model, the concomitant variable mixture | ||
| + | model, the mixture regression model and the concomitant variable mixture | ||
| + | regression model all enable simultaneous identification and description | ||
| + | of groups of observations. This study reviews the different ways in | ||
| + | which dependencies among the variables involved in these models are | ||
| + | accommodated. It is demonstrated that the standard and the concomitant | ||
| + | variable mixture models identify groups of observations and at the same | ||
| + | time discriminate them analogous, respectively, | ||
| + | and logistic regression. While the mixture regression model is shown to | ||
| + | have limited use for classifying new observations. An extension of it, | ||
| + | called the saturated mixture regression model, is shown to be useful in | ||
| + | that respect. Advantages of that model in model estimation when missing | ||
| + | data are present and as a framework for model selection are also | ||
| + | discussed. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
