seminars:stat:171207
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| seminars:stat:171207 [2017/11/17 00:22] – created qyu | seminars:stat:171207 [2017/11/17 00:23] (current) – qyu | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <WRAP centeralign>## | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP 70% center> | ||
| + | ^ **DATE: | ||
| + | ^ **TIME: | ||
| + | ^ **LOCATION: | ||
| + | ^ **SPEAKER: | ||
| + | ^ **TITLE: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center box 80%> | ||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | In this paper, we provide a simple approach to identify and estimate group structure in panel | ||
| + | models using the M-estimation. We consider both linear and nonlinear panel models where the | ||
| + | regression coefficients are heterogeneous across groups but homogeneous within a group and the | ||
| + | group membership is unknown to researchers. The main result of the paper is that under certain | ||
| + | assumptions, | ||
| + | number of groups as long as this number is not underestimated. Conditions under which estimation | ||
| + | of groups and regression coefficients are consistent and asymptotically normal are also provided | ||
| + | in the paper. Monte Carlo simulations are conducted to examine the finite sample properties of | ||
| + | the M-estimation. Findings in the simulation confirm our theoretical results in the paper. Application to labor force participation also highlights the necessity to take into account of individual | ||
| + | heterogeneity and group heterogeneity. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
