seminars:stat:140918
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| seminars:stat:140918 [2014/09/04 19:28] – qiao | seminars:stat:140918 [2014/09/18 14:14] (current) – nye | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <WRAP centeralign>## | ||
| + | |||
| + | ~~META: | ||
| + | <WRAP 70% center> | ||
| + | | **DATE: | ||
| + | | **TIME: | ||
| + | | **PLACE: | ||
| + | | **SPEAKER: | ||
| + | | **TITLE: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center box 80%> | ||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The independent | ||
| + | the survival time and censoring time are independent. | ||
| + | Williams | ||
| + | a continuous dependent RC model. | ||
| + | They show that it | ||
| + | is equivalent to | ||
| + | a continuous independent RC model. | ||
| + | Yu //et al.//} (2012) study another dependent RC model, say Model 2, | ||
| + | without the continuity restriction, | ||
| + | the necessary and sufficient | ||
| + | condition for the product-limit-estimator (PLE) | ||
| + | being consistent | ||
| + | for all time within the largest exact observation under the non-parametric | ||
| + | set-up. | ||
| + | However the asymptotic normality of the PLE under that model is not | ||
| + | addressed due to technical difficulties. | ||
| + | In this paper, we show that | ||
| + | (1) the continuous (but not the discrete) | ||
| + | W&L model is a special case of Model 2; | ||
| + | (2) | ||
| + | Model 2 | ||
| + | is equivalent to | ||
| + | an independent RC model, extending W& | ||
| + | Thus the asymptotic normality of the PLE under Model 2 | ||
| + | follows from the existing results in the literature | ||
| + | under the independent RC model. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
