seminars:alge:alge-fall2017
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| seminars:alge:alge-fall2017 [2019/04/06 04:09] – tongviet | seminars:alge:alge-fall2017 [2019/04/06 04:10] (current) – tongviet | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ~~META: | ||
| + | <WRAP center box 68%> | ||
| + | [[http:// | ||
| + | \\ \\ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | **#####The Algebra Seminar##### | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Unless stated otherwise, the seminar meets Tuesdays in room WH-100E at 2:50 p.m. There will be refreshments served at 4:00 in room WH-102. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Organizers: [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | To receive announcements of seminar talks by email, please join the seminar' | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | =====Fall 2017===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **August 29**\\ Organizational meeting | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **September 5**\\ < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **September 12**\\ < | ||
| + | An element $x$ in a finite group $G$ is said to be **real** if there exists an element $g\in G$ such that $x^g=x^{-1}$. A real conjugacy class of $G$ is a conjugacy class which contains some real element and a real class size is the size of a real conjugacy class. Several arithmetic properties of the real class sizes can conveniently be stated using graph theoretic language. | ||
| + | The **prime graph** on the real class sizes of a finite group $G$, denoted by $\Delta^*(G)$, | ||
| + | In this talk, I will outline the proof that if the prime graph on the real class sizes of a finite group is disconnected, | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **September 19**\\ < | ||
| + | a natural family of groups, which are defined by a finite amount of | ||
| + | information in the form of a certain type of finite automaton. A remarkable | ||
| + | property of bounded automata groups is that they are necessarily amenable. | ||
| + | On the other hand, the elementary amenable groups are groups that are | ||
| + | amenable for `elementary reasons' | ||
| + | is thereby motivated to identify the non-elementary amenable bounded | ||
| + | automata groups. We isolate three natural families of bounded automata | ||
| + | groups, and in each family, we identify the elementary amenable groups. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **September 26**\\ < | ||
| + | * **This talk has been canceled due to illness of the speaker**. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **October 3**\\ < | ||
| + | quandles (though no prior knowledge will be assumed). We will explore some | ||
| + | important aspects of the structure of this class of algebras and find that | ||
| + | the subdirectly irreducibles of set type are quasi-reductive. This then | ||
| + | allows one to fully classify this class of subdirectly irreducible medial | ||
| + | quandles. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **October 10**\\ < | ||
| + | called its covering number. No group is the union of two proper subgroups. Tomkinson showed that the covering number of a solvable group has the form prime-power-plus-one and for each such integer there exists a solvable group | ||
| + | having this integer as a covering number. In addition he showed that 7 is not a covering number. So far it has been shown that the integers < 27, which are not covering numbers, are 2, | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **October 17**\\ < | ||
| + | The (type A) Hecke algebra H< | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * **October 24**\\ < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * **October 31**\\ < | ||
| + | representation of a category of algebras in a category of topological | ||
| + | relational structures. After giving a careful definition of this concept, | ||
| + | we ask which finite algebras are dualizable. In particular, I exhibit a | ||
| + | class of dualizable nilpotent algebras and ask whether algebras in a | ||
| + | generalization of this class are also dualizable. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **November 7**\\ < | ||
| + | results in the character theory of finite groups such as the Ito-Michler theorem, | ||
| + | Thompson’s theorem and Navarro-Tiep’s theorem. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * **November 14**\\ < | ||
| + | the general linear Lie algebra of $n\times n$ matrices, has three well-known aspects: algebraic (highest weight theory and characters), | ||
| + | |||
| + | We will review these aspects of representation theory of $\mathfrak{gl}(n)$ and explore generalizations in two different directions: infinite-dimensional modules over $\mathfrak{gl}(n)$ and integrable modules over the infinite general linear Lie algebra $\mathfrak{gl}(\infty)$. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **November 21**\\ < | ||
| + | Subdirectly Irreducible Algebras: Big and Small //** \\ \\ <WRAP center box 90%> **// | ||
| + | variety" | ||
| + | two-element group is precisely the class of groups of exponent two. In any | ||
| + | generated variety, there is a subclass of " | ||
| + | members. This subclass depends only on the generating algebra, and | ||
| + | universal algebraists are interested in knowing how large the subclass is | ||
| + | for a given algebra. This main goals of this talk are to say what | ||
| + | subdirectly irreducible algebras are, explain why they are of interest, | ||
| + | and discuss some known results about the number of subdirectly irreducible | ||
| + | members in some generated varieties. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **November 28**\\ < | ||
| + | Group Theory Day | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | Please follow this link for details about the special talks: [[http:// | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * **December 5 **\\ < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | * [[http:// | ||
| + | * [[seminars: | ||
| + | * [[seminars: | ||
| + | * [[seminars: | ||
| + | * [[seminars: | ||
| + | * [[seminars: | ||
| + | * [[seminars: | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | <iframe src=" | ||
| + | </ | ||
